Finally, after eight, well almost nine months of agonizing tedium rewarding work, my honours thesis is complete. Weighing in at 82 pages, 32,000 words, though, its essentially an MA thesis. I hadn't set out originally to write something so large. 30 pages would have been sufficient, theoretically by departmental standards. For the subject matter, though, the space was required. So what is the subject? Well, as the title of this post might suggest, its about intellectual property rights (you know, patents and copyright...) and indigenous societies.
Initially, it was going to be about 'the nations of the south' AKA the developing world, and intellectual property rights, but the focus changed in the inevitable process of narrowing down and refining a topic.
I'm proud of the topic focus though. I think the developing world and its concerns, and especially those of indigenous peoples are forgotten in mainstream discourse, and even in academia. They're sort of like the forgotten casualty, or a remaining undigested fragment left in the wake of the technological modernity we're all involved in.
That's why it was quite a learning experience to look at these peoples and their concerns (admittedly, in an indirect way) through the completion of this research study.
Ultimately, the findings of the study can be broken down to the following.
One, that the adoption of Anglo European intellectual property rights as a preeminent global cultural policy has helped aggravate already existent problems between traditional peoples and the west. Essentially, the model of cultural production in the west (based on innovation, and individual incentives) is incompatible for peoples for whom spirituality, and communal responsibilities assume a higher priority.
In essence, this arises from the fact that western intellectual property rights were developed in the west, and never philosophically altered to take into account other cultures and belief systems.
Thus, policymakers hoping to fashion a cultural policy which takes into account the needs of indigenous peoples face a difficult situation: they often can't do away with Anglo European intellectual property rights altogether (owing to most nations' ratification of the Paris, Berne and TRIPs agreements), yet they need to accomodate indigenous peoples own legal systems as much as possible.
Thus, this study has further elaborated on a set of measures taken in progressive regions throughout the world to resolve this situation. These strategies are essentially Sui Generis in nature, meaning they are (usually) national attempts to say that indigenous cultural goods and services deserve special status within IP. For these measures to be effective, they would need to compensate for a deficiency in protection and jurisdiction within conventional intellectual property law.
Its a complex and complicated area of scholarly investigation, one at the intersection of many fields, including: Social Anthropoligy; Cultural Policy; Political Economy; Intellectual Property Rights.

Recent Comments